Author: cburmaster

  • New Faces in Madison: Breaking Down the Badgers’ Transfer Trio

    By David Giardino

    After a rollercoaster 2024 campaign, the Wisconsin Badgers entered the offseason at a crossroads. In many ways, the team had turned a corner — reinventing its offensive identity and averaging over 80 points per game for the first time in recent memory. But despite the dramatic improvements on the offensive end, Wisconsin’s season came to an abrupt end with a second-round NCAA Tournament exit at the hands of BYU.

    The loss marked more than just the end of the season — it signaled the closing of a chapter. The Badgers were set to graduate three starters: leading scorer John Tonje, who provided much-needed shot creation and all-around play; Max Klesmit, the emotional heartbeat of the team and a 3 and D stalwart; and Steven Crowl, the versatile big man whose presence impacted both ends of the floor. Alongside them, veterans Carter Gilmore and Kamari McGhee — both key depth pieces — graduated, stripping the roster of experience.

    What was once one of the oldest teams in college basketball suddenly got a lot younger.

    Wisconsin, however, didn’t blink. With Tonje, Klesmit and McGhee all being successful transfer additions in the past, the blueprint was clear — rebuild through the portal. But before looking outward, the first task was retention. Within weeks of the season’s end, the staff locked in the team’s two most promising young stars: Nolan Winter, a stretch big with athletic upside and John Blackwell, a dynamic wing with scoring potential and a high motor. Add in the return of intriguing bench piece Jack Janicki, and the Badgers had their foundation.

    From there, the focus shifted. Wisconsin needed experience, versatility and scoring — and they turned to the portal to find it. What followed was a calculated effort to reshape the roster with three key additions who bring a mix of talent, maturity and upside.

    Wisconsin’s first move in the transfer portal wasn’t just about roster fit — it was about making a statement. By landing Andrew Rohde, a Madison native, the Badgers not only filled a key positional need but reclaimed one of the state’s most talented products. After initially slipping through the cracks out of high school, Rohde returns home with a well-developed skill set and the chance to make a major impact. Just as importantly, Wisconsin secured Rohde’s services by beating out Iowa State, a program that’s made a habit of poaching top Wisconsin talent in recent years.

    Rohde’s game is built around his shooting. He’s an elite-level marksman with a lightning-quick release, able to knock down shots off the catch, coming off movement, or pulling up off the dribble. On a team that thrived offensively last season by spacing the floor and hunting mismatches, Rohde’s shooting gravity is a perfect addition. He brings a similar offensive profile to the departing Max Klesmit, but with even more polish and scoring versatility.

    Beyond the jumper, Rohde brings a well-rounded offensive game. He’s comfortable operating in the pick-and-roll, shows solid decision-making as a secondary playmaker and has the size and craft to finish on both sides of the rim. He may not be an elite ball handler, but he doesn’t need to be — his ability to attack off closeouts, read help and keep the ball moving will mesh well with returning creators like John Blackwell and Nolan Winter.

    Defensively, Rohde likely won’t be asked to hound opposing guards the way Klesmit did. But having spent last season in Virginia’s system, he enters Madison with a strong understanding of team defense principles. Wisconsin, like Virginia, relies on communication, help-side awareness and positional discipline — and Rohde’s experience in a similarly demanding scheme should ease his transition. While he might not be an elite individual stopper, his buy-in and length will keep him serviceable on that end, especially in a system that doesn’t leave defenders on islands.

    Rohde represents both a present-day contributor and a symbolic win for the program. He fills a glaring need left by Klesmit’s departure, brings elite shooting to a team that just lost three starters and reclaims local talent that might have otherwise gone elsewhere. Whether he starts or plays a high-usage bench role, Rohde’s return to Madison gives the Badgers a reliable weapon heading into next season.

    Wisconsin’s frontcourt transformation took a modern turn with the addition of Austin Rapp, a 6’10” big man from the University of Portland. Rapp chose the Badgers over a push from Oregon, a win on the recruiting trail that reinforces Wisconsin’s growing appeal among top-tier portal talent. And with three years of eligibility remaining, he’s not just a short-term piece — he’s a player the staff can develop and integrate into the core of the next era.

    Rapp’s value is clear: he can really shoot the ball. At Portland, he took nearly eight threes per game as a freshman, a remarkable number for a player his size, knocking them down at a solid 35% clip. He was a true stretch five in the WCC, spacing the floor and forcing defenses to pick their poison on pick-and-pops. While it’s unlikely he’ll take that kind of volume in Madison, his shooting gravity will still be a major weapon, especially in a system that increasingly values pace and space.

    But Rapp isn’t just a standstill shooter. He moves fluidly for his size, can attack closeouts off the dribble and makes good decisions in space. Pairing him with Nolan Winter, who also brings perimeter skill and shooting touch, gives Wisconsin a pair of bigs who can both roll or pop, and both make plays on the move. It’s a versatile, modern frontcourt that should open up driving lanes and diversify the offense even further.

    The biggest question mark is on the defensive end. Rapp averaged 1.5 blocks per game last season and shows decent timing as a rim protector. But the WCC and the Big Ten are different animals. Rapp will need to adjust to a league where opposing forwards are stronger, faster and far more physical. He’ll likely start as a power forward, shifting to the five in certain lineups, and his ability to defend that 4 spot — from post-ups to switches — will determine how heavy his minutes can be.

    Still, the upside is clear. Rapp brings skill, floor spacing and long-term potential. If he can hold his own defensively and adapt to the speed and strength of Big Ten play, he could become a cornerstone piece for this new-look Wisconsin team.

    Wisconsin’s final major portal addition of the offseason came in the form of Nick Boyd. Boyd is a seasoned 5th-year senior who spent last season at San Diego State after starting his college career with two impactful years at Florida Atlantic, including a pivotal role in their run to the Final Four in 2023.

    Boyd’s commitment marked a major win on the recruiting trail — the Badgers beat out North Carolina for the combo guard, a strong signal that Wisconsin’s recent rise is resonating beyond the Big Ten. For a team that lost multiple starters and will be leaning on younger pieces this season, landing a veteran like Boyd, who’s played deep into March, brings needed maturity, toughness, and poise.

    On the court, Boyd is a lefty combo guard with the ability to both score and facilitate. His efficiency numbers won’t jump off the page, but his skill set fits exceptionally well in Greg Gard’s swing offense. Historically, Wisconsin’s offense can stall when players are forced to attack off screens going to their weak hand. But with Boyd and John Blackwell both capable of getting downhill with their dominant hands, the Badgers can now create multiple strong-side actions within one possession — something that will stress defenses more than in years past.

    Spacing will be key, and Boyd stands to benefit from it. With shooters like Rohde around him and a frontcourt that can pull defenders out of the paint, Boyd should have more clean looks than he’s ever had before. His crafty handle, strong first step and ability to finish with his left should translate well in an offense that’s built to flow and reset — especially with a defense already shifting.

    Defensively, Boyd does come with some limitations. At 6’3″, he’ll be one of the smaller guards on the floor in Big Ten play. But he competes on that end and brings a noticeable motor — the kind of veteran energy and grit that should mesh well with Wisconsin’s team-first defensive philosophy.

    For a team getting noticeably younger, Boyd is a crucial counterbalance. He’s played on the biggest stages, knows how to win close games and should bring stability and leadership to a retooled Badger backcourt. If he can shoot it at a respectable clip and stay aggressive downhill, he has a chance to be one of the more impactful late-offseason additions in the conference.

    With the additions of Boyd, Rohde and Rapp, the Badgers’ projected starting five looks just about set: Boyd, Blackwell, Rohde, Rapp and Winter give Wisconsin a versatile, high-IQ and offensively dynamic group. The pieces fit — multiple ball handlers, capable shooters and bigs who can both pop and roll — and for a team that averaged over 80 points per game last season, the bar for offensive production has officially been raised.

    But while the starting lineup may be settled, the depth chart still has major question marks. Veterans Kamari McGhee and Carter Gilmore graduated and forward Xavier Amos recently entered the portal. That leaves Jack Janicki and Zach Kinziger as the likely primary backup guards — a solid duo, but the frontcourt rotation is far from complete.

    What’s encouraging is the timing and tone of this offseason. All three portal additions committed early — well ahead of Wisconsin’s first portal get last year — which signals both increased NIL funding and a sense of urgency from Greg Gard and the program. With plenty of offseason still ahead, the expectation is that more moves are coming.

    The top priority remains adding a true center — an athletic, rim-running big who can protect the paint and finish above the rim. Ideally, that move would allow Rapp to shift into a sixth man role, where his shooting and offensive versatility could be even more dangerous against second units. The challenge is that the center market is top-heavy and Wisconsin may need to dig deep to find the right fit.

    If that kind of player doesn’t materialize, then the focus could shift toward finding a power forward capable of soaking up backup minutes at both big spots, allowing Rapp to slide to the 5 in smaller lineups. Either way, adding frontcourt depth is crucial for a team that will rely heavily on Winter and Rapp to anchor its defensive presence.

    Beyond that, there’s also a need for a defensive-minded wing — someone in the 3-4 positional range who can give them quality minutes off the bench and spell the starters in key matchups. Versatility and athleticism on the defensive end are still lacking in the second unit and addressing that would go a long way in raising this team’s ceiling.

    The Wisconsin men’s basketball program has clearly shifted its approach in recent years, and the 2024/2025 offseason marks a key turning point. With the additions of Nick Boyd, Andrew Rohde and Austin Rapp, the Badgers have brought in a blend of experience, versatility and offensive firepower that should make this team one of the most well-rounded in recent memory. The starting lineup is set and it’s built for both short-term success and long-term development, with Boyd’s leadership and Rohde’s shooting being immediate impact pieces.

    However, the job is far from finished. With some depth issues still to address, particularly in the frontcourt and at wing, the portal remains a crucial avenue for Gard to explore. Wisconsin is in a better position than ever to attract high-level talent, thanks to increased program funding and early commitment timelines. The next step is to find the right pieces to round out the roster — specifically a rim-protecting center and a more athletic wing — and if Gard can successfully address those needs, this team could be poised for a deep run come March.

    As the Badgers continue to build off last year’s offensive strides, this season offers the perfect opportunity for them to reclaim their place among the Big Ten’s elite. The future of Wisconsin basketball has never looked brighter, and with the strong foundation they’ve laid, it’s safe to say the program is heading in the right direction.

  • Are NIL Deals Going to Ruin the “Purity” of High School Athletics?

    By Maddy Schuetz

    On April 25th, the Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Association held its annual meeting, with one of the largest and most controversial topics in high school sports up for a vote. The WIAA was once again discussing the Name, Image, and Likeness amendment, also known as NIL. Despite being shot down the first time around, the NIL amendment finally passed with an overwhelming vote of 293-108 from the member schools of the WIAA.

    Despite the vote passing, many people, including Jeremy Schlitz, are still under the belief that this amendment is harmful to high school athletics. The Madison Metropolitan School District Athletic Director, Schlitz, does not see many positives to bringing money into high school sports. “When we bring money and other private interests into education-based athletics, it kind of sullies the purity of education-based athletics,” Schlitz said. However, Schlitz, like most others who are against this amendment, may lack a concrete understanding of the new amendment. An amendment that is not as scary as Schiltz and others have made it out to be.

    The new NIL amendment has many precautions in place to ensure that many of the concerns from the first amendment proposal are addressed. Students who choose to partake in any NIL deals have restrictions on how they act and who they can work with. Student athletes can not enter into any NIL opportunities that are associated with their school, team, conference, or the WIAA. They can not wear their jersey or any school/team branding in their advertisements. Don’t worry, there won’t be any 16-year-olds supporting Busch Light in their high school football jersey. It is also prohibited for student athletes to work with industries relating to gambling, alcohol, cannabis, tobacco, weapons, or any offensive subject matter. The WIAA has also addressed one of the biggest problems with NCAA NIL deals, the transfer portal. Specific athletic eligibility restrictions prohibit athletes from transferring for better NIL opportunities. These restrictions are in place not only to protect the student athletes, but also the schools that they play for.

    This amendment is expected to be implemented at the end of May. Coaches, athletic directors, parents, and fans are all on the edge of their seats waiting to see how this will impact high school athletes and athletics. Many are questioning the importance of this amendment as it will only drastically impact 1% of Wisconsin student athletes. Is it worth the risk of disrupting the current way high school sports operate? Although it may not have huge impacts on all athletes, the amendment provides an opportunity for student-athletes to make some money from their success. It also allows these athletes to familiarize themselves with the NIL process that they will experience if they choose to continue and play at the next level.

    Name, Image, and Likeness opportunities are the current way of sports, whether people like it or not. It is not a surprise that over 40 states have now implemented NIL opportunities at the high school level. The WIAA is still working to ensure that fairness, sportsmanship, and the integrity of the game are not lost. People should not be worried about losing the “purity” of high school athletics. They should instead be excited about the opportunities that this amendment provides for young student athletes across the state of Wisconsin. Is there really something so impure about 14-18-year-old student-athletes making money off their own name and image?

  • If the NCAA is Going to be Paying Athletes like Professionals, then they Should Start Treating them like Professionals 

    By Trey Kenas

    If there’s three guarantees in life, it’s death, taxes, and the NCAA struggling to ensure that their policies don’t contain loopholes. The newest example of the NCAA’s mishaps resides in the NIL landscape, where collegiate athletes are allowed to transfer schools as many times as they please, without repercussions. The NCAA must institute (minimally) 2-year contracts between players and their respective programs, as well as a one-time transfer rule, to eliminate the recklessness that is the transfer portal and take college sports away from becoming a bidding war.

    To gain some perspective on this matter, flashback to 2024, where in that year over 1,000 players in Division 1 alone were in the transfer portal. In the 2023/2024 college football season, the transfer portal saw over 11,000 players across all divisions put their names in. How are coaches able to handle this wild goat rodeo, all while focusing on their team in the present? The answer: They’re not.

    When asked about the current landscape of NIL and men’s college hoops on “The Swing” podcast, Wisconsin Men’s Basketball Head Coach Greg Gard said, “You are more of a CEO than you are a coach.” Gard followed this up by adding,“In regards to recruiting, you spend a lot of time future casting how your roster needs. We used to do it in three to four year snapshots… Now you’re looking at one-year snapshots.”

    While some coaches are attempting to manage the sails on the choppy waters, some coaches have opted to step away from the dance floor. Legendary coaches such as Alabama football’s Nick Saban, Virginia men’s basketball Tony Bennett, and Miami men’s basketball Jim Larranaga have left their respective games largely impart to the ever changing landscape.

    “The game and college athletics is not in a healthy spot”, Tony Bennett said, in an interview this past fall with Fox Sports. “I think I was equipped to do the job here the old way… Now I came to the realization that I can’t do this,” Bennett said.

    Saban and Larranaga both agreed that the game had changed, and they were not willing to stick it out. They believed the foundational pieces of what makes the college game so great have drifted away, and thus, the bidding war has begun.

    These coaches are correct. The game has changed, and in many cases not for the better. As a coach who is currently coaching at the high school level, it’s a grind like no other. The countless hours put in day in and day out, all for the tiny window of opportunity to do something special at the end of the season that only one team gets to celebrate. Adding in that extra element of paying players with no boundaries, with an already taxing and stressful job, coaches are left with a mountain in front of them that’s too steep to climb. Many collegiate coaches have stayed in college and not pursued the professional side of things, doing so largely impart to not having to deal with players and their monetary desires. So simply put, if we’re going to start paying athletes at the collegiate level like professionals, we must implement rules to start treating them like professionals.

    Enter in player contracts, where each player is required to sign a minimum two-year contract with their respective university. This contract can be for more than two-years, obviously with monetary compensation in play. However, within the contract they are allowed to leave the school during their contract to pursue further athletic endeavors on three occasions. One; that they are going to play professionally, and are going to be out of the college game for good. Two; one of the head or assistant coaches on staff left for another job. Three; there is a family matter that requires them to transfer back closer to home. This way, coaches aren’t dealing with as much turnover within the zoo that is the transfer portal, and players are treated at the same level of coaches. If they committed to something, they are required to stick it out, save the three exceptions.

    The final layer lies in the amount of times a player is allowed to transfer. This would be limited to a one-time transfer opportunity, to eliminate the number of players jumping town to chase the bag. Players make a commitment to a program and sometimes it doesn’t work out. It happens for whatever reason that may be. They are given a chance t for a fresh start. If they desire to transfer on any further occasions, they will be required to sit out a year in the process and therefore lose a year of eligibility. This regulation keeps players from continuing to leave school year after year in pursuit of a “better opportunity” when in reality they are seeing who can cut them the biggest check.

    Ultimately, collegiate athletes should be entitled to as much money as they are worth, however it shouldn’t be at the expense of coaches and programs having to rebuild their teams each year. By implementing these guidelines, players will be able to obtain financial compensation for their abilities, and coaches will be able to coach, not act as a CEO.

  • Pioneers on the Sidelines: How Two Students Transformed Wisconsin B1G+ Broadcasts

    By David Giardino

    When Krissy Birdsall and Rachel Cohen looked at Wisconsin’s B1G+ broadcasts, they noticed something was missing. While other schools featured sideline reporters bringing viewers closer to the action, Wisconsin’s student-run broadcasts lacked this dynamic element. Rather than accepting the status quo, these two determined journalism students decided to create the change they wanted to see.

    “For me, I noticed there was a ton of interest from people at B1G+ and there wasn’t really an option to pursue on-air reporting,” Birdsall explained. “Since we don’t have a student-run TV station, it felt like there was a gap in what we could be doing as sports journalists.”

    For Cohen, the dream of sideline reporting had been brewing since childhood. “Being a sideline reporter is something I’ve always wanted to do ever since I was in elementary school watching football,” she shared. “I always loved the humanizing aspect and the reporting role so much so that I used to write fake football reports with my weekly vocab words.”

    Their path to implementation was not straightforward. Cohen began advocating for sideline reporting from her freshman year, encountering resistance with each attempt. “Every time he would say no, but I kept e-mailing and e-mailing,” she said, recalling her persistent communications with her supervisor.

    Birdsall joined the push during her junior year and together with fellow student Ariel, they formed a united front. “Realizing we should be asking for sideline as a group, Ariel, Krissy and I banded together and emailed as one,” Cohen explained. “We felt like strength in numbers would help but also show there’s a number of people that want it.”

    Their strategy worked. By the end of Birdsall’s junior year, their proposal received the green light, but challenges still remained. “The biggest hurdle was figuring out the tech aspect of it and if it was even possible to do at UW with the equipment we had,” Birdsall noted. “I think for us, making plans to do as much as possible with as little as we could helped push that process along as we were willing to try and fail to make it work.”

    The summer before implementation became a flurry of planning. “Once we got the green light, it was really cool to see the collaborative effort to figure out the timing and logistics to make it possible,” Birdsall recalled. “We communicated a ton through texts, calls, FaceTime and sharing a [google] doc and adding ideas.”

    Their persistence paid off when sideline reporting debuted during the 2024/2025 school year. The results have impressed even the founders. “The growth of our sideline reporters in just one year has been incredible,” Birdsall remarked. “Every time someone hops on the mic they improve in some shape or form and it has been really cool to see how much we’ve grown as a broadcast, production and reporting crew since September.”

    As they look toward the future, both have visions for how the program can evolve. Cohen hopes to see more dynamic coverage, “I would love to see more real-time reporting, which is something I feel like is missing right now. We all have preplanned stories which are great to share, but also talking to coaches at halftime and sharing what improvements they want to make or if an injury happens, giving that insider information would be amazing.”

    For Birdsall, who is graduating in May of 2025, her focus is on the program’s sustainability and growth. “I would love for it to continue to grow, evolve and expand,” she said. “The interest is there and if we can be a small part of growing students in their sports reporting journeys, it makes it all worth it.”

    Through determination, collaboration and a willingness to experiment, Birdsall and Cohen haven’t just changed the B1G+ broadcasts at Wisconsin—they’ve created opportunities for future generations of student journalists to gain valuable experience in sports reporting. Their story demonstrates how student initiative can transform campus media and create pathways for professional development that didn’t previously exist.

  • Change is Necessary: How the MLB “Ghost Runner” Rule is Transforming the Game in a Positive Way

    By Jordan Berendt

    “They’re ruining baseball by changing the game.” 

    This is a phrase that MLB fans, players, and coaches hear all too often nowadays. Particularly, since the MLB introduced what is often referred to as the automatic “ghost runner” rule in 2020, nostalgic baseball supporters have not held back from voicing their complaints. 

    The automatic runner rule was added during the 2020 season as part of the MLB’s attempt to shorten games and reduce players’ exposure to one another in the midst of a global pandemic. This rule consists of placing a runner on second base at the start of each extra inning during regular season games. Despite the initial mixed fan reactions to this change, many baseball lovers refused to believe the rule would last much past 2020. 

    However, as the pandemic slowly subsided and the world returned to a new normal, the rule still remained. This sparked further debate over whether having a “ghost runner” was changing the beloved game of baseball. Despite critics’ arguments, the rule was permanently implemented by the MLB prior to the 2023 season. 

    So, just like life after the pandemic, can’t fans adjust to this rule being the “new normal” in baseball? 

    The answer for many – no. 

    Unfortunately, the quote “change is scary” resonates far too closely with several long-time baseball fans. 

    I would argue, however, what these OG baseball fanatics desperately need to hear is this – CHANGE IS NECESSARY! 

    Similar to how educational curriculums, the English language, people, and many more things evolve, sports do too. Now, more than ever, Major League Baseball is in need of changes like the “ghost runner” rule to appeal to younger audiences. Audiences that will make up the future of baseball. 

    Considering this rule is now official, fans might as well try and focus on the positives. Below, I have listed five advantages of the automatic runner rule that baseball purists should consider next time they feel compelled to complain. 

    Shorter Games

    Many fans and players have come to appreciate how the automatic runner rule has significantly decreased the length of games. While the average MLB game time in 2019 was three hours and five minutes, a typical game was just two hours and 36 minutes in 2024. 

    Additionally, there is no denying that this shorter game time has increased younger generations’ appeal for the game. According to the American Psychology Society, all people, but especially children, have attention spans that are continually shrinking. One of the major contributors to this is our ever-growing digital world. 

    So, let me ask you this, what fun would extra innings be if nobody is there at the end of the game to see the outcome?

    Increased Scoring 

    Beginning extra innings with a runner starting on second leads teams to a greater chance of scoring. This fact has been proven throughout the last four years ever since the automatic runner rule was implemented. Today, teams are scoring closer to two runs on average in a single extra inning, a big improvement in most player’s eyes. 

    Healthier Players

    The longer the game, the more strain players suffer. As a result, injuries are more likely to occur and starting players are replaced by those who typically sit the bench. 

    Since making the “ghost runner” rule permanent, all players, especially pitchers, have seen a reduced risk of injury and are facing less physically taxing circumstances. Moreover, because pitchers are experiencing less pain, the negative effects of an extra inning game do not carry on for days and no longer mess with team’s pitching rotations. 

    Elimination of Marathon Games 

    In baseball, marathon games refer to games that extend into 15 innings or more. While those who oppose the automatic runner rule often favor the nostalgia associated with a 17-inning game, most people today simply do not have the time or patience to wait these games out. 

    As technology has progressed, distractions have increased, and people’s abilities to multitask have slowly dwindled. Marathon games are not practical in today’s society.

    More Action

    Lastly, who wants to go to an MLB game and see only one or two runs scored? Not me. Because the automatic runner rule has helped increase scoring in extra innings, fans are likely to get more bang for their buck in terms of entertainment. This rule has also added a new layer of unpredictability to the game, forcing teams to strategize like never before.

    Ultimately, if the reasons above are not enough to convince you that the automatic runner rule is part of the facelift that Major League Baseball needs, then I am afraid you might be stuck in the past. 

    While it is understandable that many adults feel deeply connected to the “traditional” game of baseball, change is both necessary and inevitable. It is time that professional baseball lovers start accepting this and prioritizing the future of the game. 

    As every loyal MLB fan knows, “There’s no crying in baseball!”